ιт ωαѕ ¢αℓℓє∂ ραиgαєα αкα:ραиgєα
нσρє ι ¢συℓ∂ нєℓρ
I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
The process of deforestation impacts the cycling of carbon between land and air.
Deforestation occurs when large areas of trees and other
vegetation are removed from an area in order to make room for people or
commercial enterprises. As humans remove
trees by burning, more carbon moves to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, adding
to the “Greenhouse Effect” and contributing to global warming.
Answer:
Explanation:kvdasnsvksgkgkgsdgtrgfgfdgfdgfdgfdgdggdgdgdgdgd is tht good enough?
