Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": usage of the most abundant factors of production, while the focus of the comparative advantage theory is on the productivity of the production process.
Explanation:
The Factor Productions theory, also known as the <em>Heckscher-Ohlin</em> theory, is a concept that tries to explain how international trade works. It is based on the focus that production increases capital and labor to an equal importance level. While, the Comparative Advantage theory is defined as the ability of an individual, company, or country to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its competitor.
<span>The natural rate of employment would decline, because people would have better chances at finding a way of employment. This would help cut costs in government aid and help people feel more self-sufficient and secure in taking care of their families.</span>
Answer:
b) both the values that society places on those products and the costs to society of producing those products
Explanation:
When the "invisible hand" guides economic activity, prices are known as equilibrium prices.
Equilibrium price is found where the demand curve intersects with the supply curve .
Equilibrium price is the price where both the value that society places on those products and the costs to society of producing those products are equal.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: b. The beta of the portfolio is higher than the highest of the three betas
Explanation:
The beta of a portfolio is calculated as a weighted average of the individual betas of the individual stocks. As such, the highest individual beta will be the upper limit of the portfolios entire beta.
For instance.
3 stocks A, B and C have betas of 1, 1.3 and 2 respectively.
A has a weight of 1%, B has a weight of 1% and C has a weight of 98%.
The portfolio beta will be;
= (0.01 * 1 ) + ( 0.01 * 1.3) + ( 0.98 * 2)
= 1.98
Even if the stock with the highest beta had an advantage of weighing such a high figure, it it mathematically impossible for the portfolio beta to be higher than it.
