Goals specify future ends and plans specify today's means.
Answer:
"Ordering" is the correct solution.
Explanation:
- Ordering expenses are incurred in purchasing a new shipment of manufactured goods. This would include expenditures for the attempting to place of a purchase agreement, cost savings for the evaluation including its batches expected to receive, ends up costing for documentary evidence, etc.
- The cost of ordering correlated negatively with either the cost of transport. This appears to mean because the much more purchases a business location including its providers, the significantly higher the ordering costs will indeed be.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Based on this scenario, it can be said that yes the attorney's actions are proper because the referral fee was reasonable. A standard referral fee percentage could be around 10% for a closed job, starting at around 2-5% for e-mail introductions and even up to 15-20% for referrals where the referrer deals alone with the client. As long as the referral fee is reasonable and the attorney is not taking advantage then his/her actions are proper and ethical.
Answer:
The correct answer is false.
Explanation:
A firm incurs both variable cost and fixed cost in the short run. If the firm is able to cover the variable cost in the short run it will continue operating. However, if it is not able to cover its variable cost it will stop operating.
So, if the demand falls such that total revenue is not able to cover total cost but the variable cost is being covered, the firm will not stop production.
In the long run, all the costs are variable. So when the revenue is not able to cover cost, the firms will stop operating.
