All categories

3 years ago

Solve the following system of equations using the elimination method.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Margaret [11]3 years ago

3 0

So for eliminating, you only solve for one variable first.

I solved for y, so I multiplied by -4 to eliminate the x.

Then I got y= -1

I then substituted that to one of the equations to get x.

You might be interested in

8% of the employees at a shop work part-time.

kifflom [539]

Answer:50

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

how does the appearence of a histogram change when u use many small intervals then when you use a few large intervals

vampirchik [111]

If you're using a few larger intervals, then your histogram looks more stocky. If you imagine drawing one, it's because you're adding more values into the same category which can make the difference between two intervals much more noticeable. If you're using smaller intervals, however, you can much more accurately assess the difference between two different intervals. For that reason, the transition between one and another interval would look much more 'fluid'.

5 0

4 years ago

Let X1,X2......X7 denote a random sample from a population having mean μ and variance σ. Consider the following estimators of μ:

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

a) In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

b) For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we assume that we have a random sample given by: $X_1, X_2,....,X_7$ and each $X_i \sim N (\mu, \sigma)$

Part a

In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

Part b

For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

5 0

4 years ago

I need some serious help with this asap!!! I will mark brainliest if right! Explain

34kurt

Answer:

I'm sorry this isn't the answer, but I just want you to know that you are incredible and that I love you for you! You are special to everyone you meet, and should not change who you are. I know your life may be tough, but you are strong and can get through it!

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

11 billion in scientific notation

saw5 [17]

11000000000
1.1 x 10^10

Billion has 9 zeros.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers