Answer:
The primary difference between those two concepts is focus that each term has. The first one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the level of return. While the second one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the amount of factors used for that production.
Explanation:
One the one hand, the law of diminishing marginal returns is a concept known in the microeconomics theory due to the fact that it establishes the relationship between the productivity and the income for every aspect of it. Meaning that, when the productivity increases because of the increase of only one factor of production then the income will start to slowly decrease, confirming that when only one factor is increased the production will start to be incomplete and the return will decrease for that.
On the other hand, the law of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution indicates the relationship between the level of output and the different factor used to produce. Meaning that, it shows how to keep the level of output the same while making changes in the amount of factors used.
Diego applying the systems model of change as a diagnostic framework
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The Business Diagnostics Framework is a systemized way to diagnose the form of your business. The framework emerges from the external concentric rings, evaluating primary the outside environment and then penetrating down into the essential functional areas of the business processes.
Business diagnosis is a means of operating rearward to recognize causes for inadequate execution by making the relevant links within causes and effects. Thus, it is a method of knowing the signs or conditions of a problem. The Business Diagnostics system is a different framework that assists resolve even the most complicated business circumstances.
Answer:
Annual deposit= $2,803.09
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the monetary value at retirement:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual payment
FV= {22,000*[(1.08^25) - 1]} / 0.08
FV= $1,608,330.68
Now, the annual deposit required to reach $1,608,330.68:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= (1,608,330.68*0.08) / [(1.08^50) - 1]
A= $2,803.09
I believe the answer to this question is : False
Answer:
$200 (million)
Explanation:
If the government spending increases by $200 million, then associated change in equilibrium income will be $ 200 million, assuming that Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 1
