Answer:
A
Explanation:
A is the answer to the question
Answer:
D. an incidental beneficiary.
Explanation:
These are the options for the question
A. an intended beneficiary.
B. a promisee.
C. a promisor.
D. an incidental beneficiary.
From the question we are informed about Apps LLC who enters into a contract with Birk, the chief executive officer of Corporate Sales Inc., to create an app for the firm. To fulfill the contract, Apps hires Dave as a student intern. In this case With respect to the app contract, Dave is an incidental beneficiary. A contract can be regarded as an agreement that exist between two parties and It is legally back up. An incidental beneficiary from this contract can be regarded as the third party that just get some benefits from a contract that exist between two other parties in an agreement, even though the benefits the third part gets is not intended to get it, and there is no legal right for the third party as far as the contract is concerned.
Answer:
b. A very large increase in sales. A very rapid and similar response by the other large firms in the industry.
Explanation:
As for the information there is no clear agreement to sell the goods at the same price, like that of other industries.
Further since all the companies follow the same price, there is no such differentiation.
In case one of the companies, in our case company A if decreases the price then it will abruptly that is in no clear sequence will increase its sales, and the after effects will also include the decrease in prices by other remaining industries that is B, C and D.
