Media and politicians are dependent on each other, because of how they can change a person's view.
Media, whether it be a talk show, advertisement, etc, can be used to give people 'positive' or 'negative' "opinions" at large, while putting in some facts to make the whole look like it's completely true.
To be able to get people to vote for the politician they want, there are a couple way they can do this.
Bias: Whether positively or negatively, some politicians may get longer 'air time', as well as people giving their opinions (presented as facts) to help swing votes. For example, people can say that "Obama is the best president ever because of such~and~such things he do" (positive bias), OR they can say "He is the worst president because he allowed America to fall from her great power (negative bias) Polls: Whether it is true or not, polls CAN affect how people vote. Some people vote purely to be "within the crowds", and, when seeing large amounts of people vote for a certain group, politician, or party, they will also vote for them. However, this does not affect everyone. Media can skew charts to make it different from reality, whether positively or negatively, to change how people vote (as some follow bandwagon)
In exchange, Politicians usually help the media, whether provide funds, or (if they are elected) give favors to the media.
In the end, It is for money, familiarization, popularity, or anything other, politicians and media will always work together to create 'pictures' for the public to digest before and when voting.
According to Weber, the psychologists proposed that for each of our five senses, the degree of change in the stimulus that is required to product a just noticeable difference is reliant on the degree of intensity of the first presented stimulus. In other word, the change in a stimulus that will be just noticeable is constant with its first or original stimulus.
These words were captured from the writing "The Rhythm of Life" and it was written by Matthew Kelly. What was being highlighted is that person standard can be affected and defined by the people who surrounds them. People cannot be completed and fulfilled of being alone.
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.