Answer: 1. germany. 2. they were shot.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: seeking more info, considering alt perceptions, revising their perceptions accordingly
The act of seeking more info is done to ensure the validity of the information, so the communicators do not make the same mistake and humiliate the people they represent. After considering all perceptions, the communicators should be ashamed apoligize openly for their mistake and create a public correction about it.
Answer:
a. to State the purpose and goals of the Constitution
Answer:
Political uncertainty.
Explanation:
Political uncertainty is characterized as the potential threat to alter the executive power either through constitutional means or through unconstitutional methods. A high risk of executive breakdown results in slower growth and, likewise, that slow growth, increases the potential for a change in government. The likelihood of a change of government means uncertain future policies that are marked by economic downfall, social unrest, war, revolution, death of political leaders, etc.
Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
