<span>What does my character want, and what obstacles will he or she face is essential when using CASPAR to analyze literature. In order to explore conflict in writing, knowing where the character is going and why is the point of any story in both content and readability.</span>
The syllogism "Caius is a man, men are mortal, therefore Caius is mortal." illustrates denial. The chapter is about the man's denial of death. The author describes people's exploration between new and old screens (work, propriety and decorous life) to avoid death. Iván Ilych understands that old screens can no longer help him. It is clear to him now that how trivial life was by means of time and energy consumption. Tolstoy compares Iván Ilych's previous concerns with now. The character cannot accept the irony of this past and his new condition. Analyzing this chapter, we can yield that the correct answer is B.
Answer:
The dependent clause follows the independent clause in this sentence, so no comma is needed.
Explanation:
When a dependent clause follows an independent clause, there is not need to include a comma as opposed to when the dependent clause is before the independent clause.
In this case the dependent clause being "because her brother’s stereo was turned up to full volume", follows after the independent clause which is, "Beatrice was unable to concentrate on her project". There is therefore no need to put a comma.
