Answer:
Modest short term deterrent, but will need mass executions to be effective
Explanation:
The question has already been answered but I guess you need an explanation.
In the deterrence theory by Professor Land and his colleagues, they assumes that offenders are rational, I.e. they know the law and the penalties attached to defaulting the law..
They're are three points to take note of in this study;
1. For execution to have a deterrent effect, then it means a huge number of execution must have taken place
2. Most of any deterrent effect of execution of homicide occurs immediately after the execution is made public
3. 5 to 10 homicides would deterred in a year if there are 10 to 20 executions using 0.5 homicides deterred on a monthly basis.
Answer: Accommodating style
Explanation: Conflict handling style technique which is geared towards fostering harmony and togetherness. The accommodating style of conflict handling is possible whereby one truly cherish a relationship and his willing to give up anything in other to ensure everything works out fine. It requires one to be calm and 'down to earth' or rather low degree of assertiveness and devoid of arrogance. Usually the the accommodating se of conflict handling requires selflessness and sacrifice which will be required in other to avoid jeopardizing the harmony of a relationship due to conflict.
Answer:
Because a lot of things have not yet been discovered and questioned as well as there being billions of things that we have absolutely no knowledge about.
Answer:
Multiple causes took place that eventually caused many colonists to go against Great Britain.
Explanation:
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, there were many causes that continued to pile up. Parliament had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists didn't like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war.
Most colonists disagreed. Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.
