Answer:
its -2x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Fail to reject the null hypothesis because 0.15>0.05
. There is not convincing evidence that defensive players can bench-press more weight, on average, than offensive players.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since P>a we can not reject the null hypothesis. We cannot conclude the alternative hypothesis in context.
Answer:
The answer is 33 years.
Step-by-step explanation:
10% of 3 is .3
Just move the decimal to the left.
.3 times 33=9.9
9.9~10
Answer: The new ratio will be 1/4
Explanation: The initial ratio of losses to wins is 3 to 2. If we sum the numer of losses and wins 3 + 2 = 5 games, that means they loss 3 out of 5 games , and they win 2 out of 5 games.
So if they had won twice as many of the games, that is 2*2=4. And since the number of games is the same ( 5 ), then they would have won 4 games and loss only 1.
So the new ratio of losses to wins will be 1 to 4, or expressed in a fraction: 1/4
