Not in the “environmental “ concept, but they could in a work setting concept.
Example-clean drinking water for employees or air filtration at a plant—- yes
Water issues 70 miles away unrelated to their plant. No
Answer: BY THE THREE ARMS OF GOVERNMENT (THE EXECUTIVE,THE LEGISLATURE AND THE JUDICIARY)
Explanation:The three arms of Government are an example of the constitutional principle of checks and balance.
Check and balance is the concept enshrined in the a Democratic Constitution where each of the arms of Government act as a watch for the other arm.
The legislature checkmates the activities of The Executive to prevent abuse of Power they can summon the Executive arm if they discovered any anomally.
The Judiciary have the powers to interpret laws to bring about fairness and justice for both the Executive and legislative arms.
The Executive through the president has the power not to sign bills passed by the legislature if it is not in line with existing laws.etc
The exercise is related to identifying various types of evidence from a crime scene or the scene of an accident. The student is supposed to be conversant with various types of evidence to be able to complete this.
<h3>What is an Evidence?</h3>
Evidence is defined as the proof or confirmation that something is true. This proof may be verbal, physical, or circumstantial.
Evidence can further be classified into:
- Real Evidence
- Demonstrative Evidence
- Documentary Evidence
- Testimonial Evidence.
The evidence being collected from the Florida Crash is called Real Evidence because it can be seen and collected at the scene of the crash
Please note that the question is missing a few details hence the general answer.
Learn more about Types of Evidence at:
brainly.com/question/14610702
Answer:
Criminal law is the most ancient branch of the law. Many wise observers have tried to define and explain it, but the explanations often include many complex and subtle distinctions. A traditional criminal law course would include a lot of discussions on criminal intent, the nature of criminal versus civil responsibility, and the constitutional rights accorded the accused. But in this chapter, we will consider only the most basic aspects of intent, responsibility, and constitutional rights.
Unlike civil actions, where plaintiffs seek compensation or other remedies for themselves, crimes involve “the state” (the federal government, a state government, or some subunit of state government). This is because crimes involve some “harm to society” and not just harm to certain individuals. But “harm to society” is not always evident in the act itself. For example, two friends of yours at a party argue, take the argument outside, and blows are struck; one has a bloody nose and immediately goes home. The crimes of assault and battery have been committed, even though no one else knows about the fight and the friends later make up. By contrast, suppose a major corporation publicly announces that it is closing operations in your community and moving operations to Southeast Asia. There is plenty of harm to society as the plant closes down and no new jobs take the place of the company’s jobs. Although the effects on society are greater in the second example, only the first example is a crime.
Crimes are generally defined by legislatures, in statutes; the statutes describe in general terms the nature of the conduct they wish to criminalize. For government punishment to be fair, citizens must have clear notice of what is criminally prohibited. Ex post facto laws—laws created “after the fact” to punish an act that was legal at the time—are expressly prohibited by the US Constitution. Overly vague statutes can also be struck down by courts under a constitutional doctrine known as “void for vagueness.”
