Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) They have the opportunity to reject the proposed change.
b) They will have the opportunity to know more than others about the change.
c) They will be able to convince customers the change was the right thing to do.
d) They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
And the correct answer is the option D: They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
Explanation:
To begin with, it will be more acceptable for an employee of a company or a member of a group to agree with a change if that person was involved in the planning of the change. That means that he will feel that he is part of the solution and therefore part of the team because his ideas were listened and maybe he contributed with something. That is why that members who participate in the planning of a change will always be more positive about the final outcome due to the fact that they were there during the process of deciding that outcome and that will make them feel integrity related to the work and to the team as well.
Answer:
No the given statement is not correct.
Explanation:
Federal Government does not determine the pay structure for any occupation. Each occupation determine its own salary structure. For example, the doctors would determine their own fee that they would charge to the patients, schools will determine their fee that they would charge from students, lawyers determine their own fee, and the examples are countless. Government sometimes only sets the minimum level of wage that must be paid to a worker. For example government can put a base at 10 dollars wage rate that has to be given to the worker working for you. So you must give the worker at least $10, but you can give him $15 or $20, as much as you like and as much as he charges you, but you can't give him less than 10 dollars
<span>Raoul is an illiterate who does not have proper skills for any job. As a result, he is unable to find permanent employment. As a last resort, Raoul starts a diner in his home to earn a regular income for his family. In the given scenario, Raoul most likely started the diner because it offered an income for his family using skills that he possesses. Since Raoul is not able to stand apart from competition when it comes to everyday jobs, Raoul needed to find a way to earn income for his family. Motivated to do so, Raoul put is skills to work and developed a way to make it happen for his family. </span>
Answer:
reference groups
Explanation:
Reference groups are considered a social influence in consumer purchasing. They are often groups that consumers will look to to make purchasing decisions. So if a reference group endorses a product, either through use or statements about the product, those that look to the group will often purchase that product.
Answer:
Future Value =$62,367.85
Explanation:
<em>The rate of return earned on the investment can be worked out using the Future value of a lump sum formula. The future value of a lump sum is the amount lump would amount to if interest is earned and compounded at a certain interest rate.
</em>
The formula is FV = PV × (1+r)^(n)
PV = Present Value- 30,000
FV - Future Value, - ?
n- number of years- 15
r- interest rate - 5%
Future Value = 30,000× 1.05^15 =62,367.85
Future Value =$62,367.85
