Answer: Salvation army
Explanation: Non profit organisations are those organisation, which perform their operation with the objective of social welfare or charity.
Salvation army is a charitable organisation having more than 1.7 million members all over the world, whom they refer to as soldiers. This organisation mainly serves to the poor and hungry.
Thus, we can conclude that the right option is D.
Answer:
$52,435.00
Explanation:
After 3 years the future value of 100,000 at 6 percent will be
FV = PV × (1+r)n
=FV = 100,000 x (1 +0.06)3
FV = 100,000 x 1.191016
FV = 119, 101.60
The interest will be 119, 101.60 - 100,000
=19,101.60
The depreciation over 9 year period, per year will be
=1/9 x 100,000
=11, 111.11 per year
3 year depreciation = 33,333.33( 11,111.11 x 3)
The investment must generate at least
19,101.60 + 33,333.33
=$52,434.93
=$52,435.00
Answer:
a. $6,400.
Explanation:
In solving this question on Computing the amount of Purchasing department expense to be allocated to Assembly, we'll have to use the formula below:
Purchasing department expense to be allocated to Fabrication = Total Cost of purchasing department X number of purchase order in / Total numbers of purchase orders in all operating departments
= $32000 X 4/20 = $6,400
Answer:
E. I, II, III, and IV
Explanation:
All of the mentioned strategies would work.
Employee stock option provides the enthusiasm and energy to perform good among employees. This is beneficial for the company and shareholders as well.
The threat of takeover, scares the shareholders in losing their share, and effective voting right. Also the management feels threaten as the new company might replace them with the management personnel they desire.
Management bonuses help management to get a boost in energy and accordingly motivates to work good, also the shareholders desiring performance will find it effective.
The threat of proxy fight engages both the parties to behave properly towards each other and respect each other.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If there is a more number of compounding periods within a year so it would result into the higher price of future value for lump sum investment in year 0 but the case would be adverse with the present value i.e there is less amount in the present value with regard to lumpsum amount i.e to be recieved in the future date
Hence, the given statement is true
