1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
charle [14.2K]
3 years ago
5

What is the difference between the terms "not guilty" and "innocent?"

History
1 answer:
3241004551 [841]3 years ago
4 0

Not Guilty means no sufficient evidence was found. Innocent means that they are in full knowledge that the suspect did not commit the crime. Let me know if this helped! :)

You might be interested in
Though Tokugawa Ieyasu was concerned about the success of Christian missionaries in Japan, why did he NOT take action immediatel
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

B) He was fearful of driving away the traders who contributed to Japan's economy.

Explanation:

Tokugawa Ieyasu was a military ruler also know as shogun that ruled Japan during the early 1600s.

Before his reign as Shogun, in 1549, Christian missionaries can to Japan with the aim of converting the Japanese people to Christianity. They also came with muskets, guns and other European goods which the Japanese people had interest and wanted the buy.

Over the years the Missionaries trade expanded and they became very successful, they also involved themselves in the politics of Japan.

Tokugawa Ieyasu, seeing this he became worried, he saw the European missionaries as threats because of their involvement in Japan politics. He felt they caused trouble and were putting down the traditional beliefs of Japan but he could not send them away due to the European goods they sold to the Japanese people.

In the year 1612,Tokugawa Ieyasu became frightened and afraid of religious rebellion in Japan and he forbade Christianity in Japan.

3 0
3 years ago
Which option is the best definition of historical causation?
valina [46]

Answer: the answer is c. the act of convincing others that their perspective on an issue

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the United States justified in entering World War Il? Provide evidence to support your opinion.
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Kennedy says that most historians agree that American entry into World War I tipped the scales against Germany and that without the participation of the United States the Allies would have lost, “defined as having to make a compromise peace with the Germans largely on German terms.”

6 0
3 years ago
Why did different sections of the nation have different political values in the 1850s?
Lelu [443]
Well in the 1850's was a significant time where slavery occurs. As you probably know slavery was terrible on so many levels. Becuase of the different opinions on slavery their political values changed., Some values thought that slavery was okay while the other fought against it saying that slavery should end. Different sections such as Indiana and Illinois has strong opinions to keep slavery including the south when the rest of America did not feel so strongly.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(20 points :) ) Which claims about the declaration of the rights of man and the declaration of independence are true? (select al
solmaris [256]

The correct answers are: the declaration of independence speaks of a divine creator and the declaration of the rights of man speaks of a supreme being. Both documents drew on the "natural law" philosophy of John Locke.

Indeed, the Declaration of independence explicitly mentions the Creator in the preamble:

“"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen mentions the Supreme being in its preamble as well:

“In consequence whereof, the National Assembly recognises and declares, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following Rights of Man and of the Citizen.”

Finally, although both documents draw on the natural law philosophy of John Locke, the American version is more traditional in that it considers that such rights are given to humans by a deity or transcendent being of the same kind while the French version is more secular.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Social Darwinism ______. applies the theory of evolution to human society was used as justification for Imperialism supported th
    12·2 answers
  • How is a person that would be easy to write about???
    11·1 answer
  • Would an american citizen charged with burglary be tried in a military tribunal or a civilian court
    11·1 answer
  • I need help with this question it’s really really urgent
    15·1 answer
  • What's the meaning of the God Save the Queen (United kingdom anthem)?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the media play a role in the outcome of the 2000 presidential election?
    11·1 answer
  • Which nation has no political parties, no voting rights for its citizens, and is ruled by a king?
    9·1 answer
  • PLZ HURRY I NEED THIS
    5·1 answer
  • Help me, best answer will be marked Brainliest.
    10·1 answer
  • Why is the archaeological site of pompeii so important to our understanding of life in a roman town?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!