Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
It's 2 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
I dont know how to explain this... but I'm 100% positive on the answer so
Using correlation coefficients, it is found that that the correct option is given as follows:
The correlation would stay the same because the change in units for time would have no effect on it.
<h3>What is a correlation coefficient?</h3>
- It is an index that measures correlation between two variables, assuming values between -1 and 1.
- If it is positive, the relation is positive, that is, they are direct proportional. If it is negative, they are inverse proportional.
- If the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.6, the relationship is strong.
The correlation coefficient does not have units, hence if the units of the measures is changed, the coefficient remains constant, which means that the correct option is given by:
The correlation would stay the same because the change in units for time would have no effect on it.
More can be learned about correlation coefficients at brainly.com/question/25815006
#SPJ1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Perimeter is simply length + width. They gave us that the length is 2 feet plus 2 times the width:
Subtract 2 from both sides to get 23 = 2w + w
Combine like terms to get 23 = 3w
Divide by 3 to get 
feet
