If the Nile River did not flood regularly, how might life along the Nile have been different?

Social Studies

1 answer:

vampirchik [111]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The Nile River was a basic source of living for the people. The river helped them in trade, the water from the river was used in irrigation and sustainable living.

If the Nile River was absent, the people there would have no source of trade and therefore the economy would have been unable to sustain. People would not have been able to grow food and through farming, and lack of food production would mean less survival and therefore which would lead to lesser population.

You might be interested in

Which goals did Sherman hope to achieve with his scorched earth strategy? Check all that apply. He wanted to punish the people o

alexandr402 [8]

The correct answers are: He wanted to punish the people of the South and he wanted to boost morale in the Northern states.

Sherman's March to the Sea and its scorched earth policy was a ploy by Sherman to make the war as uncomfortable as possible for the treasonous South. Sherman wanted the South to feel pain as a way to encourage them to quit the war.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You are in a country where there are only liars and truth-tellers, and they cannot be told apart by sight. you set out on a dang

iragen [17]

Wil the other guy lie is what i ask

8 0

3 years ago

In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, she must prove the defendant acte

Shkiper50 [21]

A. True. In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), she must prove the defendant acted in an extreme and outrageous manner, that the defendant acted intentionally or recklessly, that the defendants acts are the cause of the distress and that the plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct.

4 0

4 years ago

Did Euclid recorded all mathematical discoveries made in Greece up to his time

Naily [24]

Answer:

No, he didn't.

Explanation:

To put in a little bit of context, Euclid was known for Compiling the works of previous mathematicians and gather it into series of books that he published. With the hope that future generations could get a head start in mathematics without having to redo all the researches from the start.

But, he mentioned that he didn't recorded all mathematical discoveries because of these two reasons:

1. He publicly stated that all discoveries should be proven with scientific methods. This concept hasn't been generally accepted by the people in his time, even among the sciences community. There are several occurrences where theories are written without having sufficient evidence and only rely on deities. He eliminated such theories from his collection.

2. Unlike today, it is extremely hard for mathematicians to gained recognition. There were many brilliant people who made discoveries at that time, but not all of them are recognized by the mass. Making their discoveries left uncovered as they met their death.

4 0

3 years ago

Arrow Corporation makes archery supplies. While using an Arrow bow, Balto is injured due to a defect in the bow that causes an a

Airida [17]

Arrow Corporation may be liable to Balto and Chu.

Explanation:

The art or sport of using bow to shoot the arrows is known as archery. It is a recreational activity and it is also played with competitive spirit. In olden days, archery was used in combat and hunting.

In the above scenario, Arrow Corporation was famous for their archery. Balto and Chu were playing archery with the bow and arrow supplied by Arrow Corporation. Due to defect in the bow, arrow was misfired and Balto was injured. Chu who was standing nearby was also injured by the arrow.

6 0

4 years ago