<span>Prefer the 6.1 percent tax-exempt investment.
Let's do the math and see why the tax-exempt investment is the better choice. For the 8.1% taxable investment, you get taxed at the rate of 28%. Which means that you only get to keep 100%-28% = 72% of your gains. So 0.72 * 8.1 = 5.832 which means your effective earning percentage is only 5.832% which is less than the 6.1% rate you get for the tax-exempt investment. Another consideration that wasn't taken into account for the question is the earnings on the taxable investment may push you up into a higher tax bracket. Which in turn increases the tax burden on your other investments. So the better choice here is the 6.1% tax-exempt investment even though that first glance the 8.1% investment looks higher.</span>
Answer:
the elimination of competition
Explanation:
Answer:
''there will be at most as many POSITIVE rates...''
Explanation:
The measure of investments' rate of return which excludes external factors such as inflation is known as Internal Rate of Return(IRR)
It is used in;
(1). Savings and loans.
(2). Liabilities
(3). Fixed incomes
(4). Private equity and capital management.
(5). Maximizing total present value and so on.
It can be calculate using the formula below:
NPV= C(n)/(1+r)^n = 0
That is internal rate of return can be use in solving NPV = 0.
Therefore, 'With respect to engineering economics and the internal rate of return (IRR), Descartes’ rule of signs indicates there will be at most as many POSITIVE rates of return as there are sign changes in the cash flow profile.''
Answer:
"D" is the correct answer!
Explanation:
Written communication is the use of a printed message, such as letters, training manuals, memos, proposals and emails. Emails. memos etc are all technology channels or apps.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
