Answer:
Plagiarism
Explanation:
George Couros said, "Technology will not replace great teachers, but technology in the hands of great teachers can be transformational."
There is no doubt that the 21st century has unlocked a whole new world to education: a plethora of resources instantly available at the finger tips of anyone eager to learn. The problem though, lies in that that information is being laid to waste. The problem in education in the United States is not that teachers are failing to use technology, but rather that students are inadequately equipped with the tools they need to use technology appropriately. The problem is that students do not even understand plagiarism. Plagiarism 20 years ago was a much different type of infraction. Most often, if a student "cheated" it was that they copied off of a friend, they wrote the answers to a test somewhere the teacher wouldn't see, or they got a copy of a paper exam to study off of before the big test day. Today however, students plagiarize on a daily basis and don't even recognize what they are doing. Websites like Brainly.com and Quizlet allow students to ask questions, with no regard to the fact that they will get answers without having actually learned anything. The functions of "copy" and "paste" on every keyboard, every screen, and every device that reaches the internet are quickly becoming a perpetrator of the downfall of contemporary education. Rather than teaching students the skills they need to access this information appropriately, schools continue to use a method of schooling that encourages plagiarism. The worst of it is, that teachers recognize the problem, students are discouraged by their education, and yet...nothing changes. It won't be until education recognizes that students need skills and experiences rather than content and standards that education in America truly changes.
Answer and Explanation:
The author built the article showing the strategies that Obama used in his speech to reduce his disadvantages during the presidential campaign. The speech's author shows that in addition to being a good orator, Obama was also a great writer who knew words and rhetorical and literary traits very well, being able to efficiently use allusions, resonance, duality and a strong content of ethos and pathos. .
Given this explanation and after listening to Obama's speech, we can agree with the author because it is evident that Obama's speech was very well thought out and planned as a success point in his candidacy.
Answer:
A. Antipathy
Explanation:
the rest are all related to the medical field more closely than Antipathy.
Wouldn't this mostly be considered a historical question?
I understand that it is writing, but I think you could get more accurate replies by putting it under the history category.
Watching me suspiciously is the participial phrase. They give information as to what the kitten is doing.
