<h3>Answer is -9</h3>
=================================
Work Shown:
(g°h)(x) is the same as g(h(x))
So, (g°h)(0) = g(h(0))
Effectively h(x) is the input to g(x). Let's first find h(0)
h(x) = x^2+3
h(0) = 0^2+3
h(0) = 3
So g(h(x)) becomes g(h(0)) after we replace x with 0, then it updates to g(3) when we replace h(0) with 3.
Now let's find g(3)
g(x) = -3x
g(3) = -3*3
g(3) = -9
-------
alternatively, you can plug h(x) algebraically into the g(x) function
g(x) = -3x
g( h(x) ) = -3*( h(x) ) ... replace all x terms with h(x)
g( h(x) ) = -3*(x^2 + 3) ... replace h(x) on right side with x^2+3
g( h(x) ) = -3x^2 - 9
Next we can plug in x = 0
g( h(0) ) = -3(0)^2 - 9
g( h(0) ) = -9
we get the same result.
Answer:
72 chips
Step-by-step explanation:
6×10=60
60+12=72
Answer:
The right answer is:
The poll provides strong evidence that more than 61% of Americans oppose the Tea Party movement this year. Why? The P-value (0.026) is less than the significance level of 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
At a level of significance of 5%, a P-value of 0.026 (2.6%) means that the difference is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.
The difference between the proportions is significant, what means that more than 61% of Americans oppose the Tea Party movement this year.
Note: The difference in the sample proportions (3%) is not enough to claim that the difference is significant.
The right answer is:
The poll provides strong evidence that more than 61% of Americans oppose the Tea Party movement this year. Why? The P-value (0.026) is less than the significance level of 5%.
Answer:
It would roll in this direction.
Step-by-step explanation:
It would roll to the direction of maximum decrease, which is the -1 times the direction of maximum increase, which is given by the gradient of the function.
Since
For this case, the gradient of your function would be
And -1 times the gradient of your function would be
Then, at
So it would go towards
The magnitud of that vector is
and to conclude it would roll in this direction.
