The answer is A. By preventing the government from regulating religious practices
The question of whether it would be ethical for Agnozzi's experience at the store warrants a law suit is:
- Based on the fact that Agnozzi did not have any clear indication that he was deaf, the store employee was well within his rights to give chase because he did not heed to the warnings.
<h3>Ethics in a law suit</h3>
This refers to the moral grounds which a person has to challenge an experience or a situation which he or someone else was involved in that he believed was unfair and wants to contest it in a law court.
With this in mind, Agnozzi can file a law suit but he would unlikely get a favorable ruling from a judge based on the situation of things as they occurred.
Read more about ethical law suits here:
brainly.com/question/19569605
Answer:
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution basically has following contents;
1) Freedom of speech
2) Freedom of religion
3) Freedom of assembly
4) Freedom of the press
5) Right to petition.
So basically, The First Amendment to the United States Constitution has no rules related to animal rights.
And secondly, Robert Stevens didn't do any harm to animals by himself.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
It is not recorded into one comprehensive piece of legislation.
Answer: a & c
Explanation: Imight not be right
