Option C is correct. United States uses the adversarial system in its courts. The opposing attorneys have responsibility for controlling presentation of lawsuit. Attorneys may not lie but have no duty to volunteer facts that don't support their client's case.
An impartial individual or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who try to ascertain the truth and pass judgement in accordance with it, is presented with two advocates presenting their parties' case or position under the adversarial system, also known as the adversary system, in common law countries.
Because it leaves less room for the state to be prejudiced against the defendant, advocates of the adversarial system frequently claim that it is more equitable and less prone to misuse than the inquisitional approach.
To know more about Adversarial system:
brainly.com/question/5921518
#SPJ1
I think D, because they have to preserve the evidence, so they cannot mess with the body such as cleaning it. They should not be cleaning the body it will erase the evidence.
Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.
