1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol13
3 years ago
7

In 2009, which case qualified the earlier New York v. Belton court decision on conducting searches in the passenger compartments

of cars only when it is reasonable to believe the arrestee could still have access to the vehicle at the time of the search?
Law
1 answer:
insens350 [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Arizona v. Gant

Explanation:

Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.

You might be interested in
What is a general partnership
saveliy_v [14]
“A business organization where all partners are general partners who have unlimited liability and equal management authority”
3 0
3 years ago
A person who believes a judge has behaved unethically while presiding over the case should file a complaint with which entity
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

He shouldnt file a complaint

Explanation:

he shouldnt file a complaint because he wants the judge to go in hid favor and he needs to be nice to the judge

8 0
2 years ago
What are the steps for making a smooth stop?
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

Don't keep going

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
witness testifies in front of the jury that he saw the defendant enter the convenience store about one minute before he heard gu
fredd [130]

Answer:

Testimonial evidence

Explanation:

Testimonial evidence is evidence provided by people who were in the vicinity of the area where the case was located, and who, under oath, assure that they saw or heard something related to the case.

In the question, we have a typical example of testimonial evidence because a witness is assuring that he saw the defendant in the area that is related to the case, but is not necessarily providing any other type of evidence to support that claim. Whether the testimony is considered truthful or not, or relevant or not, depends on the context of the case, and on the ultimate decision of the jury.

3 0
3 years ago
2. David works at the local newspaper after school. He is one of six high school or college
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

David should go and tell what happened

Explanation:

because if he loves his job maybe because of his honesty one want fire him and leaving him to study for a job

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain five agencies of education​
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following are types of public buildings used for polling places? Select all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • What are 2 major cons about universal health care?
    13·2 answers
  • When two vehicles arrive at a four-way stop at the same time
    8·1 answer
  • What is the 2020 standard deduction for a 50-year-old married couple filing jointly, neither of whom is blind?
    7·1 answer
  • If you live on the border of Trenton and Pennsylvania does common in law apply?
    8·1 answer
  • Paano mo maipapakita ang pagiging tapat
    5·1 answer
  • Define Depreciation.​
    7·2 answers
  • Why is the high court and the supreme court of India known as the court of the records?
    6·2 answers
  • Congratulations! You were just informed that you are the new Police Chief in a rather large city where an officer-involved shoot
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!