1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol13
3 years ago
7

In 2009, which case qualified the earlier New York v. Belton court decision on conducting searches in the passenger compartments

of cars only when it is reasonable to believe the arrestee could still have access to the vehicle at the time of the search?
Law
1 answer:
insens350 [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Arizona v. Gant

Explanation:

Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.

You might be interested in
Should we keep the electoral college?
sesenic [268]
No we should not!!!!!!!!!!!!
8 0
3 years ago
What is the number one draft person in social government
natima [27]

Answer:

trump

Explanation:

im not sure about this

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the legal limits for public assemblies in the usa
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

Not sure how many you are looking for but one is gatherings near schools which can be prohibited.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An attempt by the seller to limit responsibility to the consumer in case anything goes wrong.
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

D) A contract.. that the obvious because when you do business with anyone you would want to have a contract on deck because people play games and also so if things go wrong you have proof in court.

5 0
3 years ago
You are driving in traffic on a road with two or more lanes in each direction. You should A: Avoid driving in someone else's bli
ikadub [295]
The answer would the A.
It is best to go with traffic and not tail-gate someone, but not be too under the limit so that other vehicles would not be attempting to get ahead of you, for it can be dangerous.

- Speeding tickets are, for the most part, not handed out when yo hate going with the rest of traffic, so long you are not speeding past other vehicles, weaving, etc. To make this simpler: Speed limit - 5 above.
Going UNDER the speed limit does nothing for you except ensure people in vehicles to be angry at you.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is meant by "taking the fifth?"
    8·2 answers
  • Government - T1 - 2106315 CR
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following terms is defined as "viewing one's own culture as superior to others?"
    6·1 answer
  • Explain the importance of a good contract in business.
    12·1 answer
  • It's 97° and the heat index is 108 a football player who has been laboring is on his last Windsprint and Calass from heat exhaus
    9·1 answer
  • BRAINLY!!
    14·2 answers
  • What California law did the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturn?
    9·1 answer
  • After being stopped and searched on Belsize road and being arrested for having stolen credit cards the following occurred "As we
    9·1 answer
  • Largest waterfall in the world
    9·1 answer
  • Pretend that you are the President of the Philippines, write a speech stating your plans and programs about the following sector
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!