1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol13
3 years ago
7

In 2009, which case qualified the earlier New York v. Belton court decision on conducting searches in the passenger compartments

of cars only when it is reasonable to believe the arrestee could still have access to the vehicle at the time of the search?
Law
1 answer:
insens350 [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Arizona v. Gant

Explanation:

Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.

You might be interested in
Who makes laws? Hint: there is 4
VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

congress

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the term often used by law-enforcement to describe the neighborhood of patrol officers assigned
wlad13 [49]
Answer: we need a,b,c,d to find out




Explanation: didn’t help
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you could go anywhere in the world where would you go mine is somewhere in eroupe
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Maybe somewhere tropical

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What are some similarities between the JonBenet Ramsey Case and the Lizzie Borden case?
Lelu [443]

Answer:

Both were shocking murders sensationalized by the media, ensuring the cases would be well known outside of Fall River and Boulder, and over time. Both remain unsolved, with theories involving different perpetrators. Andrew and Abby were murdered in their home with two other members of the house known to be present, Lizzie and the maid, Bridget Sullivan. Like the Ramseys, Lizzie has been thought to be guilty by a majority of people. And like the Ramseys, an unknown intruder has been offered as a defense.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What immediately occurred to various States following the Supreme Court's decision in the Shelby County vs holder case, to strik
sammy [17]

Answer:

shrek is my favorite anime

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is true of the Federal Trade Commission?
    13·1 answer
  • Amy breached her contract with Allen. The court will award Allen compensatory damages in an amount sufficient to: Group of answe
    12·1 answer
  • WHAT IS MISUSE OF ASSETS?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. first cause of First Amendment
    11·1 answer
  • Which supreme court case did the U.S. supreme court rule that
    13·1 answer
  • Gm everybody <br> What is one strength and one weakness of the Police Commission Model?
    13·1 answer
  • Which situation would not be considered a civil law case?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the relationship between the court of appeal and the supreme court UK
    8·1 answer
  • All persons born or naturalized in the united states and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
    8·1 answer
  • This has nothing to do with school but I want to go to the boywithuke concert on may 12 and it says 16+ can I (13) go with a leg
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!