Answer:
Isn't she going to invite Dan to the party?
At the moment we're studying French literature
Look the train's coming!
The Earth goes around the Sun
I think the last one is "Do you know my teacher?" I'm not too sure
Explanation:
Answer:
In today’s modern world, education has come a really long way. Nowadays, schools are giving their pupils the chance to decide which subjects they are taught, even in early grades such as grade 6. This has sparked many debates on whether giving the students this opportunity is going to be beneficial or not. I believe that this can be advantageous for the students.
Firstly, giving students the opportunity to decide which subjects they are taught can greatly boost the students’ morale. Moreover, as they would be only studying what they want, they would be less likely to drop subjects. Also, the increased motivation can result in the students performing better in their studies. In addition, some students may choose less subjects if they are given this opportunity and this would allow them to spend more time and focus on the subjects of their choice.
Giving students the opportunity to choose which subjects they are taught can make the students feel more responsible. This is because they would feel that their performance is in their hands. This is likely going to make the students think more about their career. Also, they would be more compelled to do better in the subjects that they have chosen because these subjects would be somewhat or even directly related to their dream careers. Additionally, it would also make the students feel more free and independent.
In conclusion, due to its various benefits, I think that schools should be giving its students the opportunity to decide which subjects they are taught. However, there must also be some mandatory subjects like Mathematics and language that are essential for all professions.
C: Because he made significant discoveries about electricity,
Kant's distinction between guardians and minors is based on the propensity of people to dwell in their own immaturity and let others take care of them. Both guardians and minors are victims of this propensity; only, they are placed on the opposite poles. Neither guardians nor minors dare to think for themselves. However, minors almost entirely give up their intellectual potential, indulging in their own laziness of the mind. They rely on different types of guardians. For example, priests are the guardians of their souls; physicians are the guardians of their bodies; politicians are the guardians of their social order, etc. Basically, they are lulled in their comfortable positions of non-thinkers. We have to say, though, that Kant doesn't judge on people for being one or the other. He just proposes that they can rise above those passive positions with the help of enlightenment.
