1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liraira [26]
3 years ago
6

Federal courts have the right to laws that they feel are violating the Constitution.

History
1 answer:
Arturiano [62]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Federal courts have the right to nullify laws that they feel are violating the Constitution.

You might be interested in
Who has the most power in a unitary system of government
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

central government

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Arms Race and the Space Race
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

The USSR was really in the right. They had spotted a spy plane with an American pilot inside trespassing in restricted air space and shot it down without killing the spy. Although the USSR had spies in the US, they had still caught an American spy nonetheless. The document says "After extensive questioning by the KGB, Powers was convicted of spying and sentenced to three years in prison and seven more of hard labor." This shows that the trial did take place and the spy plane really was a spy, so the Soviets did what they were supposed to do and imprisoned the man. Later on though, there was a prisoner trade that would help settle disputes

Explanation:

This answer worked for me on Edge

6 0
3 years ago
What groups ganied territory in north america as a result of the french and indian war
fomenos
The British colonies. and england
8 0
4 years ago
Question 1 Unsaved
AveGali [126]

Answer:  It doubled the size of the country and guaranteed US control of the Mississippi River.

Explanation:  President Thomas Jefferson and those favoring the Louisiana Purchase justified it as an act done for the good of the country. Initially, President Jefferson had commissioned James Monroe and Robert Livingston to negotiate a deal with France to acquire New Orleans or all or part of Florida, as a means of avoiding the potential of an armed conflict in such areas.  Monroe and Livingston were authorized to spend up to $10 million.  What they found out was that Napoleon was already set to sell a much wider range of territory to the United States, to finance his European wars.  Napoleon was asking $22 million for the whole territory that became the Louisiana Purchase.  The US team negotiated the price down to $15 million.  But then there was a constitutional crisis back home.  Did the President have the authority under the constitution to make such a major addition to the nation's territory and spend the nation's funds to do so?  Jefferson himself considered pursuing a constitutional amendment, but his Cabinet members disagreed and the measure was sent to Congress for approval.  In a statement he made at the time, Jefferson justified the purchase with this analogy:  "“It is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; and saying to him when of age, I did this for your good." 

4 0
4 years ago
Why were american sailors and marines brought to land in january 1893
AleksAgata [21]
The coup efforts were supported by United States Government Minister John L. Stevens<span> with an invasion of U.S. Marines, who came ashore at the request of the conspirators.</span><span> The coup left the queen imprisoned at </span>Iolani Palace<span> under house arrest. It briefly became the Republic of Hawaii, before eventual annexation by the United States in 1898. Advised about supposed threats to non-combatant American lives and property</span><span> by the Committee of Safety, Stevens obliged their request and summoned a company of uniformed U.S. Marines from the </span><span>USS Boston</span><span> and two companies of U.S. sailors to land on the Kingdom and take up positions at the U.S. Legation, Consulate, and Arion Hall on the afternoon of January 16, 1893. 162 sailors and </span>Marines<span> aboard the </span><span>USS Boston</span><span> in Honolulu Harbor came ashore well-armed but under orders of neutrality. The sailors and Marines did not enter the Palace grounds or take over any buildings, and never fired a shot, but their presence served effectively in intimidating royalist defenders. Historian William Russ states, "the injunction to prevent fighting of any kind made it impossible for the monarchy to protect itself.</span><span> Due to the Queen's desire "to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps the loss of life" for her subjects and after some deliberation, at the urging of advisers and friends, the Queen ordered her forces to surrender. The Honolulu Rifles took over government buildings, disarmed the Royal Guard, and declared a provisional government.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to Alberto Mora what were the assumptions the U.S. made which permitted it to use "cruel, inhuman, and degrading treat
    15·1 answer
  • Which three factors made farming successful in Mesopotamia?
    9·1 answer
  • The 7th and 8th centuries were a period of turmoil for byzantium. this period saw the loss of eastern provinces to conquest unde
    15·2 answers
  • How did the treaty of versailles help destroy the german economy
    11·1 answer
  • When the food was running low or ran out in an area, this group of people moved continually in search of it. These peoples are c
    5·1 answer
  • Japanese americans experienced which event during world war ll
    15·2 answers
  • What is a bedouin?..........
    12·2 answers
  • What is one characteristic that makes the Judaism faith different from other religions
    8·1 answer
  • What was Emperor Justinian's reasoning for building the great Hagia Sophia? A. He wanted to intimidate pagans within Constantino
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a result of the depression in Texas during the late 1830s?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!