In FDR’s “Four Freedoms” speech, what does “pacification” mean in the context of the sentence in which it is used?

1 answer:

5 0

Pacification<span> is an attempt to create or maintain peace. That can mean appeasing a hostile country through diplomacy or even just by settling an argument. A pacifist is someone who is against fighting and wars. it is saying that fdr wants peace and equality. It serves the same message has mlk's i have a dream speech.</span>

You might be interested in

How many organs in<br>the nervous system<br>

VikaD [51]

Answer:

It is widely believed that there are 100 organs; however, there is no universally standard definition of what constitutes an organ, and some tissue groups' status as one is debated. Since there is no single standard definition of what an organ is, the number of organs varies depending on how one defines an organ.

6 0

2 years ago

Best Trip Ever!

S_A_V [24]

I can’t really help with this

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why was the Constitutional Convention necessary?

ruslelena [56]

Hi! I’m taking U. S. History Honors in the 9th grade and we just reviewed this for the EOC!

The Constitutional Convention was necessary because the Articles of Confederation could not be revised or amended due to the fact that Rhode Island refused to send delegates. A unanimous decision was needed to make any amends to the government under the Articles of Confederation so the delegates decided to form a new government. The men all agreed that the federal government was weak under the Articles of Confederation because the Americans who made it were afraid of a strong central government due to the unjust oppression that Britain put upon them as colonies. The delegates at the constitutional convention were both afraid that people were going to believe they were overthrowing their current government and determined to make changes to benefit their nation to preserve their fledgling country. They made sure to draft a constitution that had both a strong central government and a bill of rights (this was to appease anti-federalists who were afraid the new government would be too controlling or become corrupt) so the government could never take away what they termed “unalienable rights”.