1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vekshin1
3 years ago
13

Find the length of XY. Imported Asset 4 8 16 11.3

Mathematics
1 answer:
kompoz [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: 8 (The second option).


Step-by-step explanation:

1. To solve this exercise you draw a line to a point O, this lines will bisect the angle of Z∠60°. Then will obtain two into two right triangles with two angles of 30° at the point Z.

2. The lenght XY will be twice the lengt XO or YO.

3. Let's  calclate XO as following:

sin(30)=\frac{XO}{8}\\XO=4

4. Then, XY is:

XY=2XO\\XY=2*4\\XY=8


You might be interested in
For the schools sports day a group of students prepared 21 1/2 lbs of lemonade at the end of the day they had 2 5/8 lbs left ove
Ludmilka [50]
I think the answer is 9 1/4
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help I don't know what to choose
Lunna [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We know a triangle adds up to 180 so:

75+36+ ? = 180

111+ ? =180

? = 69

To find out x, we know that a straight line adds up to 180 so again:

x +69 = 180

x = 111

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3х - 30 = у<br> 7y - 6 = 3х
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This one is simple substitution... at least, substitution is the easiest method. The first equation is 3<em>x</em> – 30 = <em>y</em>  and the second is 7<em>y</em> – 6 = 3<em>x</em>

As I look, I see 3 ways to use substitution to solve this:

  1. substitute 7<em>y</em> – 6 for 3<em>x</em>
  2. substitute 3<em>x</em> – 30 for <em>y</em>
  3. solve 3<em>x</em> – 30 = <em>y</em> for 3<em>x</em> and make it equal to 7<em>y</em> – 6

We're going to only use 1 method for the sake of time. Try the other two on your own. Assuming you don't make any mistakes, they will work.

<u>Method 1</u>:

3<em>x</em> – 30 = <em>y</em>

7<em>y</em> – 6 = 3<em>x</em>  — initial system of equations

7<em>y</em> – 6 – 30 = <em>y</em>  — substitute 7<em>y</em> – 6 for 3<em>x</em>

<u>7</u><u><em>y</em></u> – 6 – 30 = <u><em>y</em></u>  — marking like terms, bold for constants, <u>underlined</u> for variables

7<em>y</em> – 36 = <em>y</em>  — combining the constants and simplifying

Here, you could diverge into multiple paths: add 36 to both sides, subtract <em>y</em> from both sides, divide by 6 OR subtract 7<em>y</em> from both sides and divide by –6 . For the sake of time, I'm subtracting 7<em>y</em>, though I don't like dealing with negatives.

7<em>y</em> – 7<em>y</em> – 36 = <em>y</em> – 7<em>y</em>  — subtract 7<em>y</em> from both sides

–36 = –6<em>y</em>  — simplify

–36 ÷ –6 = –6<em>y</em> ÷ –6  — divide by –6 on both sides

<em>y</em> = 6  — simplify

Again, we can diverge here: substitute <em>y</em> into 3<em>x</em> – 30 = <em>y</em> or substitute <em>y</em> into 7<em>y</em> – 6 = 3<em>x</em>

I'm going to choose 3<em>x</em> – 30 = <em>y</em> but it will work either way, should you take the time (if you have it) to chase down every path this problem can take.

3<em>x</em> – 30 = <em>y</em>  — initial equation

3<em>x</em> – 30 = 6  — substitute 6 for <em>y</em>

3<em>x</em> – 30 + 30 = 6 + 30  — add 30 to both sides to isolate 3<em>x</em>

3<em>x</em> = 36  — simplify the expression

3<em>x</em> ÷ 3 = 36 ÷ 3  — divide both sides by 3 to isolate <em>x</em>

<em>x</em> = 12  — simplify

So, we have <em>x</em> = 12 and <em>y</em> = 6 . We know they work for 3<em>x</em> – 30 = <em>y</em>  but not if they work for 7<em>y</em> – 6 = 3<em>x</em> . Let's substitute those in to see if (12, 6) really is the solution point.

7<em>y</em> – 6 = 3<em>x</em>  — original equation

7(6) – 6 ≟ 3(12)  — substitute 6 for <em>y</em> and 12 for <em>x</em>

42 – 6 ≟ 36  — simplify by multiplying

36 = 36 ✔  — simplify by combining like terms on left side

Success! It works! We have found our solution!

I hope this helps increase your understanding of the concept. Have a great day!

8 0
3 years ago
1.Which coordinates are not of the vertices of the feasible region for the system of inequalities?
astraxan [27]
2.   I think the answer is 24

subracting the last 2 inequalities we get

6x + 7y <= 42
3x + 2y  <= 18    subtract:_-
3x + 5y <= 24
3 0
3 years ago
Test for the commutative property of union and intersection of the sets P = { x : x is all real numbers between 2 and 7} and Q =
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

P = {x : x is a real number between 2 and 7}

{x: 3,4,5,6}

Q = {x : x is all rational number between 2 and 7}

{4 }

We know that P contains all the rational numbers between 2 and 7.

And P ∪ Q and Q ∪ P each of them contain all the real numbers which are between 2 and 7.

{3,4,5,6}

Here Q is the proper subset of P

P ∩ Q = Q ∩ P = Q= {4}

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2 is 1/10 of what number
    14·2 answers
  • How many 2/7s are in 4
    12·2 answers
  • 27 less than twice a number is negative 1
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a multiple of 5
    12·2 answers
  • How many centeries are in one million years
    5·1 answer
  • Which can be used to prove that lines are parallel? 1.Vertical Angle Theorem 2.Alternate Interior Angles Theorem 3.Converse of C
    14·1 answer
  • Write an algebraic inequality for the problem, then solve it to
    10·1 answer
  • To pass her test, Tori needs to answer at least 65% of the questions correct. If there were 60
    15·2 answers
  • 2(y-5)=(3y-2) can’t solve it
    8·2 answers
  • In the year 2006, a person bought a new car for $18000. For each consecutive year after that, the value of the car depreciated b
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!