1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olganol [36]
3 years ago
6

The three most common things that can lead to unproductive driving decisions, feelings, and actions are:_______A) Getting hooked

B) Filtering informationC) Escalating a situation
Social Studies
1 answer:
Zanzabum3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

All of them are correct

The three most common things that can lead to unproductive driving decisions, feelings, and actions are:

A) Getting hooked

B) Filtering information

C) Escalating a situation

Explanation:

  • In driving, the term getting hooked means taking such a decision that results in unproductive reaction.
  • Similarly, the filtering of information is that you neglect all the details of a matter and you just focus on a small portion of information.
  • Escalating a situation means you are making a situation worse by increasing the intensity.
  • So, all of these options are correct as these are things that can lead to unproductive driving decisions, feelings and actions.

You might be interested in
What is question hour
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

IF RELATED TO POLITICS:

A session where MLAs and ministers are questioned by opposition

IT IS OE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT

3 0
3 years ago
How did Leland Stanford make his money?
Fofino [41]
Leland Stanford was an industrialist, business tycoon, politician, and the founder of Stanford University. During the California Gold Rush Stanford moved to California and started a whole sale business which grew as the economy boomed.  Stanford helped to found a major railroad company the Central Pacific Railroad and went on to make large amounts of money, enough so for many to consider him a "Robber Baron" a name given to wealth and powerful 19th century American businessmen. 
4 0
4 years ago
Gear a is the driving gear. if all the teeth are sheared off of gear b which gears will turn
frozen [14]

Answer:

Gear a            

Explanation:

Gears are pairs of rotating elements which transmit torque to the one another. Each gears have teeth on them and they mesh together to transfer rotary motion from one shaft to the the shaft. Gears can change the power, speed and the direction of power source.

In the context, it is given that gear a is the driving gear. If the gear a meshes with gear b, gear a will rotate gear b. Hence gear a is the driving gear and gear b is the driven gear. Thus gear b gets its motion from gear a.

Now if the teeth of gear b are sheared, then gear b will not be able to mesh with gear a and thus gear b ceases to stop its motion.

Thus gear a will turn.

6 0
3 years ago
The process by which members of a group individually conclude that nothing is wrong because they observe that no one else seems
Natali [406]

Answer:

It is known as pluralistic ignorance.

Explanation:

Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.

An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.

The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.

<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>

6 0
3 years ago
How does Frederick Douglass view American Democracy in 1852?
zmey [24]

Answer:

Indeed, Douglass knew, as he argued so ardently in his famed 1852 July Fourth speech, that for democracy to thrive, the nation's conscience must be roused, its propriety startled and its hypocrisy exposed. Not once, but continually and for the good of the nation, he argued, we must bring the “thunder.”Feb 10, 2018

Explanation:

This is the site I got the info from:

Why Frederick Douglass Matters - HISTORYhttps://www.history.com › frederick-douglass-bicentennial

NOT MY WORDS! I HOPE THIS HELPS THO :)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which would not be a description of the French relation with the Native Americans? Warfare Trade Exchanging ideas Living peacefu
    11·1 answer
  • Elizabeth was driving on the freeway when a car passed abruptly in front of her and almost hit her vehicle. As a result of the s
    5·1 answer
  • One day while gardening, Greg tripped over a coil of wound-up hose and fell face first on the pavement. He suffered damage to hi
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a reason psychologists may subject an animal used in research to pain, stress, or hardship? A. Whe
    13·2 answers
  • What makes the middle colonies unique?
    8·1 answer
  • What was ONE effect of Jim Crow Laws and segregation? A) African Americans were treated as equals by white Americans. B) African
    12·1 answer
  • Use this free trade agreements resource to complete the following chart for two countries listed (except Mexico and Canada). For
    13·2 answers
  • What were the beliefs in Ancient Rome
    15·2 answers
  • In a command economy decisions about which goods are produced are based on:
    15·2 answers
  • David attempts to minimize the costs of his relationship with Daniel while maximizing benefits. He enjoys Daniel's company, but
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!