Answer:
la respuesta correcta es jdjfhf
Answer:
Yes, the company is liable because Jamal was on his work route and took a minor detour to pick shirts he needed for work.
Explanation:
Generally what determines if the company is liable or not for a car accident, is if the employee was acting within the scope of his/her normal employment activities. In this case, even though Jamal took a break to pick up some shirts for work, he didn't deviate form his normal activities and not even from his normal work route. He was actually coming back from making a delivery.
It would have been different if he had gone to a different neighborhood or downtown just to pick the shirts. You must also consider that Jamal drives the delivery truck 10 hours a day, and that doesn't leave him a lot of spare time for his own personal activities, and this particular one was also related to his work.
This situation is similar to an accident happening when a truck driver is stopping to go to the bathroom or eating something while travelling.
Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Good X and Good Y are substitute goods. Substitute goods are the goods that can be consumed in place of each other. There is a positive relationship between the price of one good and the demand for its substitute good. For example; tea and coffee. If the price of tea increases then as a result demand for coffee increases, because drinking tea become more expensive for the consumers as compared to the coffee. So, the demand for coffee increases, despite its price remains the same.
Answer:
<u>Profit</u>
Explanation:
Revenue refers to the total receipts by a business for the sale of it's output.
Cost refers to the expenditure incurred for manufacturing products or creating a service.
The difference between the above two i.e revenue and costs, is termed as profit.
Profit can be of two types, economic profit and accounting profit. Accounting profit is calculated by deducting actual costs incurred from total receipts.
Economic profit on the other hand also considers implicit costs i.e opportunity costs, while calculating profits.
The answer is "nominal damages".
Nominal damages alludes to a harm or damage grant that is issued by a court when a legitimate wrong has happened, yet where there was no real budgetary misfortune because of that lawful wrong. Regularly, when an nominal damage grant is utilized, the offended party will be granted $1 or $2. This may appear to be senseless, however nominal damages fill an essential need.
