Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. The remaining options read:
A. The Allan Liner Virginian provided incorrect information about the events that occurred and now reporters have the true story.
B. The author claims that there was interference with messages because all of the wireless messages needed to be relayed, which caused miscommunication.
C. The author claims that he received incorrect information that the ship stayed afloat and acknowledges that the ship actually sank.
D. The author claims that he thought all passengers were saved, but in reality, he learned that many drowned.
Answer:
<u>B. The author claims that there was interference with messages because all of the wireless messages needed to be relayed, which caused miscommunication.</u>
Explanation:
<em>Recall, </em>the author's response was that there was interference with messages because all of the wireless messages needed to be relayed, resulting in miscommunication of the data therein.
In my opinion it would be B. I choose this answer since it sounds more appropriate in this sentence and it makes more sense. From using the word "well" it makes it slide off your tongue better while saying the sentence. Its hard to explain it more but i hope this helped! :D
