Answer:
If Raven's monthly payment were $125, the amount of the loan that she is considering taking out would be less than $43,205.56.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you think about it this way it may be more simple. If the APR stays constant then a greater payment will result in a greater loan. The opposite is also true meaning a lesser payment will result in a lesser loan. If the amount Raven pays is greater than $145 then the loan will be greater than $43,205.56. If the amount she pays is less than $145 then the loan will be less than $43,205.56. Of the options, only one of these situations will be present. In my case, the correct option was a payment of $125 will result in a lesser loan than $43,205.56.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's 1 cup of water
You need 2 cups of pancake mix more than water so if you have 3 cups of pancake mix then you'd need 1 cup of water.
6 cups of mix = 4 cups of water
the cups of the mix is are 2 more cups than the water
3 cups of mix = 1 cup of water
I hope that helps and good luck! :)
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
