Answer:
The cost of goods sold is $68970
Explanation:
The cost of goods sold is the cost of inventory that a company sells in a partcular period.
The cost of goods sold can be calculated as,
Cost of Goods sold = Opening inventory + Purchases - Closing Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold = 16500 + 71500 - 19030 = $68970
Answer:
Trial Income Statement:
Service revenue $17,000
Rent expense ($3,500)
Insurance expense ($350)
<u>Wages expense ($10,500)</u>
Net income $2,650
*We need to adjust other expenses like supplies or utilities. I assumed the salaries paid were for a 10 days period since no one pays salaries in advance.
Trial Balance Sheet
Assets:
Cash $62,200
Supplies $1,000
Prepaid insurance $3,850
<u>Equipment $10,000 </u>
Total Assets $77,050
Liabilities and Equity:
Accounts payable $8,000
Wages payable $7,000
Common Stock $60,000
<u>Retained earnings $2,050 </u>
Total Liabilities and Equity $77,050
Explanation:
July 1
Dr Cash 60,000
Cr Common stock 60,000 (6,000 stocks $10 par value)
July 3
<u>Rent expense 3,500</u>
Cr Cash 3,500
July 5
Dr Prepaid insurance 4,200
Cr Cash 4,200
Adjusting entry July 31
Dr Insurance expense 350
Cr Prepaid insurance 350
July 7
Dr Supplies 1,000
Cr Accounts payable 1,000
July 10
Dr Wages expense 3,500
Cr Cash 3,500
Adjusting entry July 31
Dr Wages expense 7,000 ($3,500 x 2 10 day periods)
Cr Wages payable 7,000
July 14
Dr Equipment 10,000
Cr Cash 2,500
Cr Accounts payable 7,500
July 15
Dr Cash 8,000
Cr Service revenue 8,000
July 19
Dr Accounts payable 500
Cr Cash 500
July 31
Dr Cash 9,000
Cr Service revenue 9,000
Dr Retained earnings 600
Cr Dividends payable 600
Dr Dividends payable 600
Cr Cash 600
Answer:
Explanation:
An appellate court will reverse a lower court’s decision on the basis of the facts only
when the finding is clearly erroneous (that is, when it is contrary to the evidence
presented at trial) or when there is no evidence to support the finding. Appellate courts
normally defer to a trial court’s decision with regard to the facts of a case, however, for
several reasons. First, trial court judges and juries have the opportunity to observe
witnesses and tangible evidence first hand. The appellate court sees only a cold record of
the trial court proceedings and therefore cannot make the kind of judgments about the
credibility of witnesses and the persuasiveness of evidence that can be gleaned only from
firsthand experience. Second, as occurs when there is no jury and the case is heard by a
judge, trial judges routinely sit as fact finders. As a result, they develop a particular
expertise in determining what kind of evidence and testimony is reliable and what kind is not
Answer:
Xia Co.
1-a. The relevant costs for Xia Co. to make or buy the part:
Direct materials $2.25
Direct labor 1.00
Incremental overhead 0.75
Total relevant cost $4.00
1-b. Xia should make the part. It will cost Xia $4.00 to make the component while it costs it $5.00 to buy. It should therefore, make the component.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Price of buying component = $5
Cost of making component:
Direct materials $2.25
Direct labor 1.00
Incremental overhead 0.75
Total relevant cost $4.00
b) The relevant cost for making the component is $4.00. The overhead cost based on 200% direct labor is not a relevant cost. It is an allocated fixed cost and must be incurred whatever decision is taken. By making the component, Xia Co. will be netting in a unit contribution of $1 ($5.00 - $4.00) with the alternative of buying.
