Which of these actions would have fit in with the approach to change advocated by mainstream Civil Rights leaders?

2 answers:

4 0

Most likely, going on a hunger strike to raise awareness about racial injustice. Mainstream civil rights activists advocated a nonviolent approach.

Fantom [35]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

"going on a hunger strike to raise awareness about racial injustice"

Explanation:

The Civil Rights Movement in the United States was a long, and mainly non-violent, struggle to extend full access to civil rights and equality before the law to groups that do not have them, especially black citizens. There have been numerous movements in favor of other groups in the USA. UU over time, but the term is generally used to refer to the struggles that took place between 1955 and 1969 to end discrimination against African Americans and end racial segregation, especially in the southern United States.

You might be interested in

What actions between Charles I and Parliament resulted in an English Civil war?

tresset_1 [31]

Like his father, Charles I imprisoned his adversaries without a fair trial and milked the nation for money. By 1628, he needed Parliament's help and was forced to sign the Petition of Right, but he ignored the rules of it and dissolved Parliament. Charles and Laud tried to force the Anglican prayer book on the Scottish, but they revolted. Charles needed funds to quell the rebellion, so he called on Parliament again. Parliament rebelled this time, claiming that it could not dissolve without its approval. In 1642, he lashed back, bringing his troops to the House of Commons to seize its radical leaders.

Explanation:

Like his father, Charles I imprisoned foes without a fair trial and squeezed the nation for money. By 1628, he needed Parliament's help and was forced to sign the Petition of Right, but he ignored the rules of it and dissolved Parliament. Charles and Laud tried to impose the Anglican prayer book on the Scottish, but they revolted. Charles I needed funds to suppress the rebellion, so he called on Parliament again. Parliament rebelled this time, claiming that Parliament could not be dissolved without its own consent. In 1642, he lashed back bringing his troops to the House of Commons to arrest its radical leaders.

7 0

2 years ago

How did the film birth of a nation contribute to racial violence?

Shtirlitz [24]

It depicted the KKK as the good guys. And depicted black men as aggressive beings who just want to sexually assault white women.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why people join labor union

Leno4ka [110]

Aside from social pressure to join a union, some workers become union members simply because the employment contract requires them to do so.

It would appear that unions serve a broad network of employee needs.

One of the big reasons workers join a union is to ensure fair treatment in the workplace.

3 0

3 years ago

When did the nomads flourish?

Viktor [21]

Answer:

2 million years ago

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were specific limits placed upon the government by the English Bill of Rights?

baherus [9]

Answer:

The English Bill of Rights created a constitutional monarchy in England, meaning the king or queen acts as head of state but his or her powers are limited by law. Under this system, the monarchy couldn't rule without the consent of Parliament, and the people were given individual rights.Mar 6, 2018

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago