Which of these actions would have fit in with the approach to change advocated by mainstream Civil Rights leaders?

2 answers:

4 0

Most likely, going on a hunger strike to raise awareness about racial injustice. Mainstream civil rights activists advocated a nonviolent approach.

Fantom [35]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

"going on a hunger strike to raise awareness about racial injustice"

Explanation:

The Civil Rights Movement in the United States was a long, and mainly non-violent, struggle to extend full access to civil rights and equality before the law to groups that do not have them, especially black citizens. There have been numerous movements in favor of other groups in the USA. UU over time, but the term is generally used to refer to the struggles that took place between 1955 and 1969 to end discrimination against African Americans and end racial segregation, especially in the southern United States.

You might be interested in

What has led to the increase of immigrants from Asia and Latin America?

Ghella [55]

<span>C. The evaluation of restrictions for becoming a United States citizen.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who immigrated to the U.S in the 1800's during the industrial revolution

Kamila [148]

Answer:

Between 1870 and 1900, the largest number of immigrants continued to come from northern and western Europe including Great Britain, Ireland, and Scandinavia. But "new" immigrants from southern and eastern Europe were becoming one of the most important forces in American life.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

What are big achievements of phonecians helllpppppp please

Roman55 [17]

They were the best Ship Builders and best Sailors of Mesopotamia. They made the first see through glass.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Your view on the british after you witnessed the amristar massacre?

astraxan [27]

Amritsar is also called the JallianWala Bagh massacre. it is one of the most gruesome killing if the common civilians who assembled and were on peaceful strike in Amritsar.

Explanation:

Though Indians supported the British in their wars against Germany and Ottoman empire, The British Raj lacked trust on some of the radical Indians who understood the real purpose of the Britishers to occupy India. Gradually British decided to repress Indians by passing Rowlatt act which authorized the Britishers to imprison the revolutionaries just based on suspicion and the press were also not given the rights and freedom of speech and expression. General Dyer also restricted any association of more than four members in the public places in Amritsar.

But more than twenty thousand civilians assembled in the public park called JallianWala Bagh. General dyer ordered the cease fire and more than four hundred people were killed. This made the Indians to lose hope on the British Government and from thereon the nationalism spirit of Indians rose to such an extent that Independence was indispensable for Indians.

7 0

3 years ago

Centorship, a one party dictartorship,

Luda [366]

Centorship,a one party doctatorship,a replacment for religious ideals.....i hope that helped..

8 0

3 years ago