What is the definition of hawks and doves

2 answers:

7 0

terms applied to people based upon their views about a military conflict. A dove is someone who opposes the use of military pressure to resolve a dispute; a hawk favors entry into war. The terms came into widespread use during the Vietnam War, but their roots are much older than that conflict.

sineoko [7]4 years ago

4 0

DOVES AND HAWKS are terms applied to people based upon their views about a military conflict. A dove is someone who opposes the use of military pressure to resolve a dispute; a hawk favors entry into war. The terms came into widespread use during the Vietnam War, but their roots are much older than that conflict.

https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/dictionaries-thesauruses.../doves-and-hawks

You might be interested in

List 4 ways that power was taken away from political parties and given to the people during the Progressive Era. (Hint: one list

Alexxx [7]

Explanation:

The period of US history from the 1890s to the 1920s is usually referred to as the Progressive Era, an era of intense social and political reform aimed at making progress toward a better society.
Progressive Era reformers sought to harness the power of the federal government to eliminate unethical and unfair business practices, reduce corruption, and counteract the negative social effects of industrialization.
During the Progressive Era, protections for workers and consumers were strengthened, and women finally achieved the right to vote.
Characteristics of the Progressive Era include purification of the government, modernization, a focus on family and education, prohibition, and women's suffrage.

5 0

3 years ago

HELP ME PLEASE! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!

Eduardwww [97]

1. he broke a criminal law. criminal Laws are breaking a law and getting punished for it. and that is what he did he was speeding over the limit so he got a ticket as punishment.

2. t’s a regulation. Because this an official rule or order that guides behavior related to the state.

3. The purpose of the law related to the scenario is to protect people safety because the law is about how fast you go on the local road. if you go faster than 45 miles then you can have an accident and that goes to show that if we didn't have this law there would be accidents all over.

4. i believe he does have a valid argument because his wife was going into labor and he wanted to get her to the hospital as fast as he could

6 0

3 years ago

During the 1840s, which speaker provided audiences with a firsthand account of enslavement?

cricket20 [7]

<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "Frederick Douglas", since Douglas was a highly educated ex-slave. </span></span>

4 0

3 years ago

Which was not a characteristic of both the ottoman and mughal empires

Tems11 [23]

Autocratic authority was wielded by Islamic emperors.

5 0

3 years ago

15 POINTS + BRANLIEST The question is in the yellow

Kipish [7]

Canasatego is saying his land can be used over and over and what ever settlement he gets from the white man would deplete rather quickly. As well as the white man treats them poorly and they settle there anyways without consent take up all the game and grass their game used to feed on. The Governor on the other hand is saying that the land has no use to the natives completely disregarding the fact they (the natives) have lived on that land for centauries. In addition the governor also states that the white man would improve the land by cultivating it and implementing industry.

5 0

3 years ago