This would be describing a "thesis", which basically means an argument made by a historian based on original research (primary sources) and secondary research to add to an existing body of knowledge.
Answer:
Wilson took advantage of the Republican split, winning 40 states and a large majority of the electoral vote
Explanation:
It is recommended but it’s not a necessity
Answer:
Answer Choices/
A) seized power from him.
B) made him give the throne to his brother.
C) forced him to sign the Magna Carta.
D) started a civil war in England.
Explanation:
Unhappy and tired of King John’s tyrannical rule, a group of Barons of England<em> C) forced him to sign the Magna Carta.</em> The Magna Carta was a charter of rights that established a more powerful parliament, stated the liberties of free men and that reduced the power of King John, whose rule was perceived as abusive especially toward people and in his imposition of high levies, even in the absence of war. Under this new framework, everybody, including the king, was subject to the law.
The King, having no better option, agreed to sign it on 15 June 1215.
(ᵔᴥᵔ) <u>May I have brainiest Please?</u> (ᵔᴥᵔ)
"The cause of" would be the answer
