For the monthly fee, we first have to subtract the installation fee of 85 from the total cost for two years which is 685. Why? Because an installation fee is a one time thing. You don't install every year. So less the installation fee, our internet service cost for two years is 600. To make things easier, lets get the service costs for one year. Divide 600 by 2 and you will get 300. 300 is the cost of the internet for a whole year. Divide this by 12 (12 months in a year) and you will get 25. The monthly cost is $25.
The profession that will allow Mary interpret laws and codes for different individuals and companies is the attorney profession.
<h3>What does the
profession of
attorney entails?</h3>
Basically, an attorney refers to a legal profession who are appointed to act for other firm or individual in either business or legal matters.
The attorney also performs the role of advising their clients regarding their litigation and the legal issues they might be face in a pending case.
Thus, the profession that will allow Mary interpret laws and codes for different individuals and companies is the attorney profession.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about attorney
<em>brainly.com/question/16753549</em>
Answer:
FDR implemented many government programs.
Explanation:
Government programs are generally at odds with the idea of laissez-faire capitalism. Laissez-Faire capitalism refers to the economic idea in which market forces drive the market, and thus an invisible hand is often pictured with it. Instead of having the government pass programs to solve problems, laissez-faire economists believe that the market will solve societal issues (war, poverty, famine, social programs, etc.).
Thus, FDR's actions do not line up with this method because he was in the field of using government programs to solve the issues that arose after the war. FDR spent more money on the government, opposing the idea that market forces alone would help the U.S. out of the recession. FDR's First 100 Days program, in which he attempted to pass as much legislation as possible, particularly contradicts the idea of the invisible hand guiding the market.
