<em>Part </em><em>A</em>
<em>5.4-3.1=2.3 - time </em><em>David</em>
<em>Part </em><em>B</em>
<em>4</em><em>,</em><em>9</em><em>+</em><em>3</em><em>.</em><em>1</em><em>=</em><em>8</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>time </em><em>T</em><em>ed</em>
<em>Part </em><em>C</em>
<em>So</em><em> </em><em>answers</em><em>:</em><em> </em>
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>.</em><em>3</em>
<em>2</em><em>. </em><em>8</em>
You're welcome amigo
Analytical thinking involves identifying, defining, and solving a problem by using data in an organized, step-by-step manner.
Analytical thinking way analyzing the data, amassing the records, and checking whether the declaration follows logically in identifying reasons and consequences. The reasoning is one of the key factors of analytical questioning. In an interview for a process, humans are regularly requested to evaluate their analytical capabilities
Approaching each setback and failure as an opportunity to learn is an example of analytical thinking. Leaders regularly include past learnings to resolve gift problems. They may be first-rate at attending to the heart of trouble and locating the logical solution.
Analytical skills are a wide-ranging set of expert traits that encompass the capability to assume critically, analyze information, make tough decisions, and clear up complex issues. These essential ability sets all involve taking in new information and mentally processing it in an effective manner.
Learn more about thinking here brainly.com/question/25434379
#SPJ4
Answer: Caracteristicas de una persona solidaria:
1 Son personas que ayudan sin distincion alguna o discrimacion.
2 Suelen ser personas empaticas.
3 Son capaces abrir espacios sin exclusión alguna.
4 Tienden a ser personas con mucho amor y cariño que transmitir.
5 Son conocedoras de las situaciones sociales.
¿Puedo obtener un brainliest
Explanation:
Answer: The third statement
Explanation: The techniques he employed to use is were a possible fault could occur. Because the principle office is not were every student of the school would go and not every 4th student that enters the office would represent the same thing of what other students are saying. I believe the technique used might be wrong. I would employ that he should consider going to the cafeteria and do some research on the policy and see at first hand the reaction of the students than the principle office.