1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
3 years ago
10

-9x^5 + 36x^4 + 189x^3 in factored form

Mathematics
1 answer:
Alex73 [517]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

-9x^5(x+3)(x-7)

Step-by-step explanation:

factor out -9x^3 from the expression

You might be interested in
Natasha is 12 years old and her teacher is 36. Which ratio best repersents Natasha's age in 4 years and here teachers age in 4 y
julsineya [31]
I think it is A- 1:3 :)
3 0
2 years ago
A new, trendy department store is experiencing exponential growth across America. The chain began in 2004 when it opened 16 stor
QveST [7]
The equation is y=16(1.35)ˣ.

This equation is of the form y=a(1+r)ˣ, where a is the initial amount, r is the rate of growth expressed as a decimal number, y is the total, and x is the amount of time.  For our problem, a is 16; b is 0.35 (35%=35/100=0.35).  This gives us the equation above.
7 0
3 years ago
Which expression is equivalent to -3x + 9?
Olenka [21]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

You use the distributive Property

-3(x-3)

-3x+9

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.0003214 -0.00034}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00034(1-0.00034)}{420095}}}=-0.654  

p_v =2*P(Z  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.005 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the true proportion not differs significantly from the specified value of 0.00034 or 0.034%.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

n=420095 represent the random sample taken

X=135 represent the subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today)

\hat p=\frac{135}{420095}=0.0003214 estimated proportion of subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today)

p_o=0.00034 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.005 represent the significance level

Confidence=99.5% or 0.995

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% :  

Null hypothesis:p=0.00034  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.00034  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0003214 -0.00034}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00034(1-0.00034)}{420095}}}=-0.654  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.005. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.005 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the true proportion not differs significantly from the specified value of 0.00034 or 0.034%.  

4 0
3 years ago
Please help! Need help asap!
Sedbober [7]

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The two angles in the triangle in the question are 58 degrees and 54 degrees.

Three angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees

58 + 54 + x = 180

112 + x = 180

subtract 112 on both sides

x = 180 - 112 = 68 degrees

Only option A has a triangle that has the same angles, thus triangles are similar.

please give thanks by clicking heart button! :)

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How to find the third side of a non right triangle?
    13·1 answer
  • In 2017 State A produced 779 million pounds more apples than State B. Together the two states produced 1945 pounds of apples fin
    5·2 answers
  • A tree that is 4 meters tall casts a shadow that's 2.5 meters long. A building has a shadow that's 20 meters long. How tall is t
    14·1 answer
  • Consider the equation: -10x + 5y = -20 Re-write the equation in slope-intercept form​
    12·1 answer
  • Equation for line graphed
    15·1 answer
  • The ratio of the perimeters of two rectangles is 4 to 7. The perimeter of the larger rectangle is 42 inches. Solve for the perim
    5·2 answers
  • What are/is the coefficient(s): 47 > 7m - 9
    7·1 answer
  • Assume that SAT scores are normally distributed with mean 1518 and standard deviation 325. Round your answers to 4 decimal place
    14·1 answer
  • Johann uses 42 ÷ 7 to represent the number of players who are on teams. Explain what 42 ÷ 7 means. Enter a number in each box. 4
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!