Hi there!
Usually, this is the case. However, just like when hoverboards first came out, there was a shortage of hoverboards and production activities had to ramp up production. However, after a few months, production activities were at a high level, but demand petered out.
-AwesomeRepublic :)
The hindsight bias and overconfidence, plus our eagerness to perceive patterns in random events, can cause tendencies that may lead us to overestimate our intuition. Intuition and intellect are not always accurate, therefore these factors are not trustworthy compared to scientific facts or scientific inquiry which can help us overcome our intuition’s biases and shortcomings.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
Modified Rebuy.
Explanation:
Modified Rebuy can be defined as the desires of a buyer to re-purchase or reorder the products previously bought but with certain modifications either in prices, products, suppliers, or terms. The buyer may modify the current purchasing terms because he may not be satisfied with the supplier or may have some new requirements.
In the given case, the modification in supplier has been made by the organization to get a better price. Thus this is an example of modified rebuy.
So, the correct answer is modified rebuy.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The conservative approach is that the firm has greater level of working capital investment than the competitor or industry average. So to fund the higher level of working capital the company has a set of policy and targets related to the level of debt level which means the company will not be willing to borrow further money if their borrowing exceeds the set limit or benchmark. They might use the equity instruments (Preferred stock or Common equity) to fund the higher level of working capital.
So their no absolute argument whether the denominator will increase or the nominator will increase in the Total debt to capital ratio. Hence the statement is false.
