Answer:
A
Explanation:
Before domestication of animals, these animals were wild and early humans used to hunt for food. The hunting process was not always successful and took a lot of energy from the body. Domestication of these animals made food available and other conveniences. An example is cows that emanated from the domestication of wild aurochs. They provided the milk and meat for humans and also labored in the farm in the cultivation of domesticated plants.
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
It is A: Uracil
DNA and RNA is my favorite subject in Biology and Anatomy
Answer:Our ancestors’ perception of taste was important for survival and thriving. Now researchers are trying to produce food with reduced calories or salt that remains palatable
Explanation:
Evolution of taste
Our ancestors had to seek out their food from the environment, and their perception of taste was important for survival and thriving. ... They work with foods that are being produced in a manner that reduces calories or salt or adds ingredients with potential health benefits from plants
Prophase. This is the first stage of nuclear division
Hope this helps