Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
you can solve for the fractions first, but you have to give them a common denominator
which is in simplest form
then solve for the whole numbers
3-2=1
therefore, the answer is
Answer:
The measure of arc EBC is 220°
Step-by-step explanation:
step 1
Find out the measure of angle COB
we know that
m∠COB+m∠DOC=90° -----> given problem
we have that
m∠DOC=m arc DC -----> by central angle
m arc DC=50°
so
m∠DOC=50°
Find m∠COB
m∠COB+50°=90°
m∠COB=40°
step 2
Find out the measure of arc BC
we have that
m arc BC=m∠COB -----> by central angle
m∠COB=40°
therefore
m arc BC=40°
step 3
Find out the measure of arc EBC
we know that
m arc EBC=m arc EB+m arc BC
m arc EB=180° -----> because the diameter divide the circle into two equal parts
so
m arc EBC=180°+40°=220°
Answer:
1.7m
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that 'm' was the waiting time before the outbreak
After the outbreak, waiting time increased by 70%.
This implies that :
70% of m increase
m + 70% of m
m + 70/100 of m
m + ( 70÷100 ) × m
m + 0.7m
= 1.7m
Answer:
If the null hypothesis is true in a chi-square test, discrepancies between observed and expected frequencies will tend to be small enough to qualify as a common outcome.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here in this question, we want to state what will happen if the null hypothesis is true in a chi-square test.
If the null hypothesis is true in a chi-square test, discrepancies between observed and expected frequencies will tend to be small enough to qualify as a common outcome.
This is because at a higher level of discrepancies, there will be a strong evidence against the null. This means that it will be rare to find discrepancies if null was true.
In the question however, since the null is true, the discrepancies we will be expecting will thus be small and common.
Answer:
It is not a function
Step-by-step explanation:
The plot shows (1, 1) and (1, 3) are both defined by the relation. It does not pass the "vertical line test", which requires the relation be single-valued everywhere.
