1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
const2013 [10]
3 years ago
7

Many U.S. cities are adopting ranked voting in municipal elections, where voters rank the candidates in order of

Law
2 answers:
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is b definitely
seropon [69]3 years ago
3 0
The answer to this is B
You might be interested in
Person's motor skills are
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

awesome

Explanation:

that's really cool

3 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Phyllis Schlafly, the danger the Equal Rights Amendment poses to the fabric of America is that a. African-American
labwork [276]

Answer:

a. African-American women from poor backgrounds will be considered equal to highly educated and accomplished white women.

Explanation:

Phyllis Schlafly, a conservative activist, known for her opposition to feminism and her pivotal role in the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s.

She believed that women's pursuit of social equality would hurt women living in sensitive situations. She believed it was unfair to equate young, wealthy, successful, white, healthy and educated women with poor, black, uneducated, old and sick women. She said that feminism did not think of women in delicate situations, who could not face the world and say that they have the same rights and duties as all of society.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who here is in K12 (I am that's why I posted this duh -_-)​
den301095 [7]

Answer:

i used to do k12 but then i stopped for some reason

5 0
3 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
What is evidence-based criminology? How does the meaning of the word evidence in evidence-based criminology differ from the evid
Vesna [10]
Can you show me a picture of your work, or maybe use brainly’s quick answers
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a characteristic of a government?
    9·1 answer
  • Besides the magistrate court, which other trial court does not have jury trials? Why do you think this court doesn't have jury t
    9·1 answer
  • What area of domestic policy does the security and exchange commission help regulate ?
    5·2 answers
  • Are executive orders ever unconstitutional?
    14·1 answer
  • Question 29 (3 points)
    7·1 answer
  • What if the defendant later admits that they did in fact kill the victim. Are they getting away with murder or could there be an
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER IM BEGGING
    13·1 answer
  • Landry owned and operated a car service station in a small village. He sold the station to Harold, agreeing not to open another
    7·1 answer
  • A person charged with a crime has a constitutional right to: A. receive a trial by jury . B. demand a trial in federal court . C
    9·1 answer
  • Plsssssssss help me list down 20 human rights<br>​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!