Answer: (give brainliest)
False
True
False
Answer:
The argument for the company would be based on the fact that, she could have had a defective tooth which only broke while eating the Katydids candies.<em> Most times, the warranty offered in food is with regards to the food being expired, unwholesome for eating due to foreign materials inside etc.</em>
<em>Her filing for breach of warranty over her defective tooth is uncalled for.</em>
Explanation:
Answer;
A) The patient's insurance information has been entered incorrectly.
Explanation:
because people mis-pell things, and are careless, it happens all the time.
The 6th amendment gives the accused an impartial jury.
Answer:
I don't believe the prosecution should use the prior conviction in trial other than to provide a background. Since she was already convicted of the crime it can't be used against her anyways.
Explanation:
