Answer: cultural diversity has its positive impact only if there is democracy, i.e. free movement of goods, ideas, people. If there is this freedom, then Europe is an extremely creative, free and progressive place. Europeans experienced times of nationalism, wars, revolutions so Europe in itself is not a guarantee of creativity, freedom and progressive thinking, but if there is a population able to establish really "European lifestyle" than diversity can have unique consequences.
Explanation: usually there is a tendency to supress differentness, but Europe experiences the worst consequences of such tendency so there is some sort of notion that diversity is creative and productive and that it is worth of taking care of. Impact ? Populations speaking different languages. educated, flexible, able to work with advanced technologies, psychologically open, accostumed to "different" things, able to travel to distant places and learn.
I’m not entirely sure, but since no one has answered yet, I’d go with C. It seems to relate most to what the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans disagreed on most.
Answer: The most logical initial action is to " Check the result obtained with a leaner setting of the mixture". Option A is most correct.
Explanation: in a carburetor engines, roughness of the engine is always caused by the mixture of air and fuel differences in the cylinders. When this is noticed during elevation. The first thing a pilot need to do first is to check the mixture of air and gas applied to the leaning settings. Then enrich the mixture of air and fuel gently, this is done by reducing the density of air, until the engine start running smoothly.
If the mixture of air and fuel is over leaned the RPM will begin to drop, which will lead to roughness in the engine
