Answer:
Major General Andrew Jackson fought the Battle of New Orleans for a number of reasons. First is that neither the British not Jackson and his men had heard that the two warring sides had already signed a treaty to end the hostilities in Ghent, Belgium on December 24th, 1814. Also, Jackson had been a prisoner of the British during the American Revolution and he was said to still hold a lot of personal animosity towards them for that reason.
Explanation:
Jackson had declared martial law in New Orleans and called on anyone and everyone to try to defend the city from the British incursion. Skirmishes began on Dec 23rd, 1814 and culminated in the Battle of New Orleans on the 8th of January, 1815. The American group of militia fighters and whomever else was prepared to defend the city were able to outwit the British who suffered many casualties despite the upper hand they had in terms of tactics and equipment.
I think it is a drop in stock prices
Answer:
Explanation:
Not sure about the first question (not taking classes about this) but the second question the answer is the third option!
Hope you find the first question!
It might be placed the industrial society within the sociology field in order to complete this questions. So this idea might refer to a society driven by technology to gain mass production to support a big population as well as, the division of labour in that particular society.
Answer:
We have to find the author, time, intended audience, main idea, context, bias, and accuracy of the text.
Author - a candidate for government office.
Time - government election campaign.
Intended audience - potential voters.
Main idea - the candidate is the only one who can be trusted with taxpayer money, and this is crucial because taxpayer money is being wasted.
Context - Government intervention does more harm than good: raising taxes on successful businesses to fund failing public schools only has the effect of both reducing wealth creation, and educating children poorly.
Bias - the candidate has anti-goverment bias.
Accuracy - the candidate does not provide evidence to back his claims in the speech, thus, the accuracy of it cannot be properly gauged.
