Answer:
The aftertax salvage value of the equipment is $302,964
Explanation:
In order to calculate the aftertax salvage value of the equipment, first we would need to calculate the Book value of the equipment after 4 years as follows:
Book value of the equipment after 4 years = Purchase price *(1-depreciation rate each year)
= $2,000,000*(1-0.2-0.32-0.192-0.1152)
=$345,600
Loss on sale = $281,000-345,600
= 64600
Tax benefit on loss = $64,600*34% = $21,964
Therefore, After tax salvage value = selling price + tax benefit
= $281,000 + $21,964
=$302,964
The aftertax salvage value of the equipment is $302,964
Answer:
Capability ratio = 1.04166
Explanation:
Given:
Length of a shoe (not deviate) = 1 mm
Standard deviation of this length = 0.32 mm
Number of standard deviations = 3
Find:
Capability ratio = ?
Computation:
Capability ratio = [Length of a shoe (not deviate) / Standard deviation of this length] / Number of standard deviations
Capability ratio = [1 / 0.32] / 3
Capability ratio = 3.125 / 3
Capability ratio = 1.04166
Capability ratio is greater than 1, therefore process is capable.
Global Trade, or commerce, involves the transfer of the ownership of goods or services, from one person or entity to another, in exchange for money goods or services. Help to Grow the Society.
Cashiers at a department store are authorized to make price adjustments for customers of up to $25 without getting approval from their supervisors. This would suggest that the department store is a decentralized organization. In a company with decentralized organization the <span>decisions are not made centrally by the head of the company (in our case manager of the store and supervisors) , but decisions are made by mid-level or lower-level managers (cashiers in our case).</span>
Answer:Governments intervene in markets to address inefficiency. In an optimally efficient market, resources are perfectly allocated to those that need them in the amounts they need. In inefficient markets that is not the case; some may have too much of a resource while others do not have enough. Inefficiency can take many different forms. The government tries to combat these inequities through regulation, taxation, and subsidies. Most governments have any combination of four different objectives when they intervene in the market.
Maximizing Social Welfare
In an unregulated inefficient market, cartels and other types of organizations can wield monopolistic power, raising entry costs and limiting the development of infrastructure. Without regulation, businesses can produce negative externalities without consequence. This all leads to diminished resources, stifled innovation, and minimized trade and its corresponding benefits. Government intervention through regulation can directly address these issues.
Another example of intervention to promote social welfare involves public goods. Certain depletable goods, like public parks, aren’t owned by an individual. This means that no price is assigned to the use of that good and everyone can use it. As a result, it is very easy for these assets to be depleted. Governments intervene to ensure those resources are not depleted.
Macro-Economic Factors
Governments also intervene to minimize the damage caused by naturally occurring economic events. Recessions and inflation are part of the natural business cycle but can have a devastating effect on citizens. In these cases, governments intervene through subsidies and manipulation of the money supply to minimize the harsh impact of economic forces on its constituents.
Socio-Economic Factors
Governments may also intervene in markets to promote general economic fairness. Government often try, through taxation and welfare programs, to reallocate financial resources from the wealthy to those that are most in need. Other examples of market intervention for socio-economic reasons include employment laws to protect certain segments of the population and the regulation of the manufacture of certain products to ensure the health and well-being of consumers.
Explanation:
ok
