Answer: You have just committed an attributional bias called: fundamental attribution error.
Explanation: attributional bies reffers to errors made when people try to explain their own behaviour or other's people behaviour based on their own analysis of social situations. In this case, it's a fundamental attribution error because Mark is making an assumption on Allison's behaviour not considering the influence of situational factors and overemphasising the role of dispositional factors such as the distraction Allison may have in her current actions.
The sailors recounted their journey's as what people see in the work of artists which is paradise.
The Federal Reserve Act of 2000 says that the Fed "shall maintain <u>long run </u>growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy's <u>long run</u> potential to increase production.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Act was created in 1913 and signed by the then ruling president as a way of establishing economic stability. This act introduced the central bank to oversee the state monetary policies. The law was established to set out the structure, purpose and function of the Reserve System.
Due to recession and other financial crisis prior to 1913, investors lacked trust in bank systems, therefore the act was passed to bridge the gap between citizens and the banking system. Over the years it has been amended by Congress to keep up with the changing financial times.
Assuming that it is now the president can not rule things that are unconstitutional though his veto is basically that he can not pass laws and he can not make laws
I believe the answer is: directive style
In a directive style of management, the managers will specifically mentioned to the employee about the lists of what they need to do.
Even though this style may limit the employee's creativity, it would definitely satisfy the type of managers with low tolerance.
