Participate in the democratic process. Respect and obey federal, state, and local laws. Respect the rights, beliefs, and opinions of others. ... Pay income and other taxes honestly, and on time, to federal, state, and local authorities.
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
I’m almost completely sure it B
There are several reasons why Ted Bundy deserved the death penalty. He killed a lot of people
<h3>Reasons why the death penalty was an
adequate punishment for Ted Bundy:</h3>
- He killed a lot of people in the society.
- He was a predator.
- He raped people.
- He was a kidnapper
- He had no mercy for the people he attacked.
- He was jailed, he escaped from Jail and still killed again.
- If granted parole in years later, someone like him would still atatck innocents again.
- It was the good that the society got rid of him. People like him would always be a danger to other good people.
- The people that he killed did not deserve to die also. He was only made to tast his own medicine.
Read more on the death penalty here: brainly.com/question/509558
