Yes it can , from what I read. This defense case took place somewhere in India justifying the sanction of wild cows on farm lands while the owner of the land tried suing the city/jury office for unreasonable tresspass . The issue was of wild cows tresspassing on farming lands and ruining the till , in India this is acceptable because cows are religious/spiritual guides to Hindu-ism . The case was dropped on religious terms because you cannot rule Hindu IN India as unjustified. The cows are spiritual guides and can roam where they please.
NOW- in the USA you CANNOT rule religion/orientation as a first class defense justifying your acts (such as the cows running wild on private property) so this would NOT be able to be used to argue in the jury system. The cows would be poached or sent to farm lands.
Explanation:
In many places in present-day India,"wild" and stray cattle are serious problem to farmers. The sacred-cow concept contributes to a significant waste of beef and inefficiency in cattle breeding. Homes for old cows are basically religious institutions that divert funds from other needs of the nation.
The answer to this fill in would be A. Active because if one is conscious and fully concentrated to the speaker, it would be active listening! hope this help!! brainliest answer?
When a bill is passed in identical form by both the Senate and the House, it is sent to the president for his signature. If the president signs the bill, it becomes a law. Laws are also known as Acts of Congress. Statute is another word that is used interchangeably with law.
