Explanation:
Constitution of Nepal 2015 (Nepali: नेपालको संविधान २०७२) is the present governing Constitution of Nepal. Nepal is governed according to the Constitution which came into effect on Sept 20, 2015, regarding the Interim Constitution of 2007.[1][2] The constitution of Nepal is divided into 35 parts, 308 Articles and 9 Schedules.
The Constitution was drafted by the Second Constituent Assembly following the failure of the First Constituent Assembly to produce a constitution in its mandated period after the devastating earthquake in April 2015. The constitution was endorsed by 90% of the total legislators. Out of 598 Constituent Assembly members, 538 voted in favor of the constitution while 60 people voted against it, including a few Terai-based political parties which refrained from the voting process.
Its institutions were put in place in 2010 and 2018 through a series of direct and indirect elections in all governing levels.
Its been a while since I did this topic, but I believe it was mostly because under communism there was little work for intellectuals, so they were often the ones who left the country. This resulted in a 'brain drain', a lack of knowledgable people. I seem to remember reading about the entire maths department of a university just up and leaving at one point. You could also argue that it was damaging for the image of communism if so many people were trying to leave.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Judge Fujita is sentencing a defendant who is convicted of a felony crime that carries a mandatory sentence of four years in prison. Judge Fujita sentences the defendant to a one-year sentence instead. The judge had the option to modify the sentence under the presumptive sentence.
The presumptive sentence serves as a guideline to the judge when sentencing. It is when the judge decides the appropriate sentence to a specific crime. The presumptive sentence contains the number of years in jail and the kind of fines the judge can dictate. To do this, the judge takes into consideration other factors such as the criminal record of the defendant and the aggravating factors.
Efficiency wages may cause a <u>surplus</u> of labor because they are <u>above</u> the equilibrium wage.
The efficiency wage is higher than the equilibrium wage, which might result in a labor supply.
Since the efficiency wage in question is higher than equilibrium wages, there will be a labor surplus since more individuals will be eager to work as a result of the wage rise. Due to the fact that supply is more than demand, this will result in a rise in supply and an excess of labor.
There is a labor surplus in the sense that a sizeable segment of the work force produces less than it consumes and its marginal product is below the wage agreed upon via negotiation.
To learn more about equilibrium wages
brainly.com/question/14718127
#SPJ4
