A cloud of gas and dust in outer space, visible in the night sky either as an indistinct bright patch or as a dark silhouette against the other luminous matter
Answer:
It is not a specific party that might spend more, but more of which person is running.
<u>For example: </u>If there was a candidate that was extremely wealthy and was running as a democrate, then they would invest more money in there campaign then the other party if the other party isn't as wealthy.
<u>In other words:</u> There is not one specific party that spends more money.
That is a tough question. For a time, about 50 years, Athens had a direct democracy in which citizens (only those eligible which were adult male citizens) directly voted on legislation and executive bills. It was more democratic than our representative government today in America, but it is hard to say whether it was a "full" democracy or not without the definition of a "full" democracy provided. I hope with the information I have given you can determine whether they did or not.
The only suitable answer is earthquakes because it could rupture the side of the mountain it is on causing it to fall and break.
Answer:
Inductive argument.
Explanation:
An inductive argument is the use of accumulated instances of evidence to support a general conclusion about something particular. Inductive reasoning is used to describe the possibility that a situation will be true in the future. An inductive argument is kind of argument in which the arguer wants to be convincing enough that if the assumptions believe to be true then the inference would be impossible to be false.